Capstone: Evaluation Rubrics

 Problem Solving Rubric - A1a Designing an Intellectual Product, Service, or System

Category

Below Standard

Meets Standard

Exceeds Standard

Design Ideas

· Develops a paper that is not analytical and fails to demonstrate how the ideas for the paper were formulated

· Develops an analytical, critical paper that demonstrates how the ideas for the paper were formulated

· Develops an analytical, critical paper that provides a detailed description of how the ideas for the paper were formulated

Research

· Lacks awareness of similar work done by others in an unacceptable literary form

· Reflects awareness of similar work done by others and presents it in an acceptable literary format

· Reflects thorough understanding of similar work done by others and presents it in a acceptable literary format

Choices

· Lacks justification of choices with little or no references to functional, aesthetic, social, economic, or environmental considerations

· Justifies choices made with reference to functional, aesthetic, social, economic, or environmental considerations

· Demonstrates sophisticated justification of choices with reference to functional, aesthetic, social, economic, or environmental consideration

Establishing Criteria

· Lacks establishment of criteria for analysis, developmental and critiquing of the topic

· Establishes criteria for analysis, developmental and critiquing of the topic

· Establishes detailed criteria for analysis, developmental and critiquing of the topic

Implementation

· Does not establish criteria for analysis, developmental and critiquing of the topic

· Demonstrates evidence of planning and implementing of development of the topic

· Demonstrates sophisticated evidence of planning and implementing of development of the topic

Grammar

· Demonstrates poor use of conventions to establish the topic

· Uses appropriate conventions to establish the topic

· Demonstrates sophisticated use of appropriate conventions to establish the topic

Product Analysis / Evaluation

· Provides insufficient evidence of analytical, critical, and developmental thinking of the topic in terms of research and comparison of similar work done by others

· Demonstrates thoughtful evaluation of analytical, critical, and developmental thinking of the topic in terms of research and comparison of similar work done by others

· Demonstrates sophisticated evaluation of analytical, critical, and developmental thinking of the topic in terms of research and comparison of similar work done by others